The Moon, Earth's First Space Station

I have often wondered why we as a technologically advanced society, having advanced in so many areas since we first set foot on the Moon back in '69 have never returned. Of course there are many interesting conspiracies theories and ideas about why this has not happened and yet not one definitive answer that we can all agree on. Even NASA (Never A Straight Answer) has refrained for pinpointing the reason for the public, preferring to simply sidestep the issue. In The Moon, Earth's First Space Station I use critical thinking, research and books, interesting facts and speculation to arrive at some unique conclusions.

What better way to observe the human race than to take an already existing planet, tow it into Earth's orbit, hollow out it's interior, modify it's orbit so that one side is the only side seen from Earth and set up shop. Consider for a moment an advanced Humanoid space faring race intent on populating the Galaxy, upon finding a suitable planet one would need a observatory that would go unnoticed, why not hide in it plain sight.

The Moon is unreachable yet close enough to keep an eye on your developing hybrid species. What better way to populate the galaxy than to introduce your DNA into any native species found occupying the Worlds that you wish to occupy. This is the main point to my article, The Moon, Earth's First Space Station is an artificial structure of intelligent design, just not our intelligence or design.

I have been paying close attention to the Moon for months now ever since I began noticing that it was behaving oddly and I began looking into, not only it's erratic orbit which I discuss in The Moon Also Rises, but the anomalies associated with it. In, Two Moons Get Real, I discuss some of the disinformation being spread by the mainstream media about the Moon.

A fellow Hub writer extraordinaire known as Sparkster has published a series of articles on this very subject that are well written and worth reading.

The fact that most, if not all, of the Moon's craters are too shallow for their immense width and size, is truly startling and has lead to the speculation that just beneath the surface of the Moon lies an extremely durable and hard layer of some unknown material of incredible strength.

The fact that the Moon is too big to be a satellite ( a quarter of the size of the Earth ) and has a perfect orbit as compared to other satellites that orbit Planets in our Solar System, is interesting in the fact that no scientist can explain it.

The fact that only one side of the Moon EVER faces the Earth, hence the term Dark Side of the Moon, is also very interesting and cannot be explained satisfactorily.

The fact that many of the rocks brought back from the surface of the Moon have actually been dated older than the Earth, is fascinating and yet science has no satisfactory answers for this phenomenon. Two of the rocks brought back from the Apollo 12 mission have been dated at 20 billion years old.

Further more various experiments have created Moon quakes that have lasted for hours and many scientist speculate that this may mean the Moon is hollow.

This has lead many scientist to believe that the massive amount of UFO sightings around the Moon are actually originating from inside it. It should be noted that after the first initial flights to the Moon NASA changed their communication tactics with the astronauts to allow the Houston Space center to censor any and all radio signals. Before this change was made HAM radio operators could listen in on the communications . . . what were they hiding?

Because of it's distance from the Earth, the Moon which is considerable smaller than the Sun actually produces a perfect fit for a total eclipse, this occurs nowhere else in the solar system.

The famous science fiction writer Isaac Asimov had this to say about that strange coincidence:

"What makes a total eclipse so remarkable is the sheer astronomical reason why the Moon and the Sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion. "

He goes on to say that not only should the Earth not have a satellite but that its immense size (the Moon is over 2,000 miles in diameter) defies the natural laws of the Universe. Planets that are of the general mass and size of the Earth such as Mercury and Venus have no satellites. Earth with it's weak gravitational field should not have a satellites that is a fourth of its size, but more like 200 hundredth of its size, if at all.

The Moons gravity, as taught to all of us in school is one-sixth of Earth's, but what is very interesting and leads to much confusion, is that based on this information the equigravisphere in space between where the Earth's gravity no longer has any hold on a spacecraft and where the Moons gravity takes over is not where it should be. It actually is much closer to the Earth than it should be, so either Newton and Einstein's theories are wrong or NASA' information is wrong . . .

. . . but what if they are both right and wrong at the same time?

What if gravity actually has different laws in different parts of space? What I'm proposing is, and this is not an original thought, that all of the calculations done about space, the speed of light and gravity have one thing in common . . . they are calculated from the perspective of living on the planet Earth, which has limited our ability to think beyond our own three dimensional confines.

Just as a Black Hole is capable of capturing light and holding it so that it cannot escape, what if the reverse is true also. The further light moves away from the gravity of planetary bodies the faster it goes.

I suggest that many scientist's suspect this (read The Source Field Investigations by David Wilcock) and that by keeping the common man from learning the true nature of our Universe it in affect traps us in our own limited view or perspective of what is possible.

The book Dark Moon by Mary Bennett (Only Planet of Choice) and David S. Percy (Two Thirds) goes into great detail about many such subjects. They do not reject commonly held beliefs but they just add interesting theories and explain scientific facts that are not commonly known and that NASA has deliberately withheld from the public.

They do however reject the premise that the known astronauts such as Armstrong, Cooper and Aldrin ever made it to the Moon, at least not with Apollo technology and probable never left the Earth's orbit. They offer compelling evidence to support this, however they are convinced that we did actually go to the Moon and when we said we did.

Their book Dark Moon is very interesting and I won't ruin the premise by explaining it to my readers but it is very good, if a bit long, it is well explained!

• There are 366 days in an Earth year

• Earth is 366 times bigger than the moon

• The moon is 27.31% of Earth’s size.

• The moon orbits the Earth once every 27.322 days

• The Earth’s speed used to be slowing down, but in 1999 scientists discovered that it had finally stopped and settled in 27,780 meters per second...

...which just so happens to be 1/10,000th of the speed of light in a vacuum.

• For every 10,000 Earth days, the moon completes 366 orbits around the Earth.

• 100 / 366 = 0.27322

• There are 109.245 Earth diameters across the face of the Sun at Earth’s aphelion;

• There are 109.267 Sun diameters between the Sun and the Earth.

• The Moon’s equatorial circumference is 10,920.8 kilometers

• The moon spins at a rate of exactly 1 kilometer per second at its equator. Very perfect. Not some random speed.

• The Earth rotates 400 times faster than the moon.

• The Moon is 400 times smaller than the sun.

• The Moon is 400 times closer to the Earth than the sun...

...and this allows for total solar eclipses, which do not occur on any other planet in our solar system.

This data was collected from UFO Casebook and interesting web site dedicated to unexplainable phenomenon concerning Space exploration.

In the book Dark Mission by Richard C. Hoagland and Mike Bara they claim with much evidence and research that NASA's true intentions for visiting the Moon was in fact to retrieve Extra Terrestrial artifacts left behind by far more advanced beings. That these artifacts were known to exist years in advance and their existence and retrieval were vital to National Security.

The Brookings Institution ( A Washington D.C. think tank) was consulted in 1959 to access the Space Program and among their findings this paragraph stands out:

“While face-to-face meetings with it [extra-terrestrial life] will not occur within the next 20 years (unless its technology is more advanced than ours, qualifying it to visit Earth), artifacts left at some point in time by these life forms might possibly be discovered through our [NASA’s] space activities on the Moon, Mars, or Venus.”

I propose that the artifacts suggested in the findings of the Brookings Institute were more than just speculation and were indeed known to exist. I believe that is the very reason NASA was created in the first place as a means of retrieving these artifacts. The Space Race, like 'The Cold War' were just public marketing strategies designed to produce the motivation and money to achieve various secret projects that the public would not approve of.

The Cold War created fear to keep the public motivated to continue to support the military allowing them to create massive underground cities, weapons and research to protect our leaders and public.

The Space Race also created National Pride and motivation to supply NASA with the funding necessary to reach the Moon. We spent little time there, never tried to set up a permanent settlement and eventually stopped going back even though we had the Equipment paid for and crews trained and ready to go.

In Dark Mission the author's provide many detailed photos and information by NASA showing cities and structures on the Moon's surface. They show photos that huge glass or transparent domes cover much of the surface. Their 'evidence' is compelling and extensive and goes a long way to reveal the deception that NASA has perpetrated on the public for more than fifty years. They also offer testimony that NASA itself is behind the Moon landing hoax!

Consider what NASA has achieved by reaching the Moon? Nothing!

Have they explained why we haven't been back? No!

Here is a conversation between Neil Armstrong the first Astronaut to set foot on the Moon and a College Professor at a NASA symposium years later.

Professor: "What REALLY happened out there with Apollo 11?"

Armstrong: "It was incredible, of course we had always known there was a possibility, the fact is, we were warned off! (by the Aliens). There was never any question then of a space station or a moon city."

Professor: "How do you mean "warned off"?"

Armstrong: "I can't go into details, except to say that their ships were far superior to ours both in size and technology - Boy, were they big!... and menacing! No, there is no question of a space station."

Professor: "But NASA had other missions after Apollo 11?"

Armstrong: "Naturally-NASA was committed at that time, and couldn't risk panic on Earth. But it really was a quick scoop and back again."

Armstrong confirmed that the story was true but refused to go into further detail, beyond admitting that the CIA was behind the cover-up. Why not go into more detail, was he afraid of the CIA?

I believe that we were allowed to retrieve these artifacts, nothing more nothing less. Knowing that those that retained control of the masses would not allow them to benefit anyone but themselves, to further maintain their control.

The Moon is an observatory and also base for those that still control this planet. While they maintain control through an invisible electronic shield designed to keep signals from reaching us, they will never let us off this planet or communicate with anyone outside their influence. It has nothing to do with the fact that we have nuclear weapons or that they have laws that prevent them from interfering with our species development.

It has to do with controlling the farm, pure and simple, it is about investment and return. How we conduct our daily affairs is our business, much the way a rancher cares very little what his cows and horses do on a daily basis. We will not be allowed to destroy the investment in a nuclear holocaust, but considering there are over 7 billion of us, limited warfare is allowed.

If we choose to spend our limited resources squabbling over them, so be it, but the overall welfare of the farm is essential.

The artifacts that were retrieved were to further advance electronic devices in our daily lives, from computers to cell phones, for the purpose of control. Feel free to believe what you like, but the research proves that what ever else came from our trips to the Moon the boom in electronics devices has practically taken over every facet of human existence from . . .

"That one small step for man and one giant leap for mankind."

The reasons we have not advanced beyond this planet, although we obviously have the technology to do so, is that we are not allowed to. The Moon, Earth's First Space Station was not put there for the benefit of mankind, but to keep a tight leash on the Earth Farm . . . ah but perhaps that will require another hub to explain!

First of all, if you're waiting for others to offer you proof, so you don't have to do your own thinking, don't hold your breath looking for it on my hubs, as you won't find it. What I offer is speculation and research, you are free to make up your own mind and grow your own brain. In this article, The Moon, Earth's First Space Station, I offer interesting Moon facts, evidence the Moon is not a natural formation, my own thoughts on the subject, research and critical thinking (what you do with this information is your business)!